This news story originally provided by The Dominion Post
August 27, 2004
E-voting machines have long record of glitches
It's unfortunate that The Dominion Post did not take the time
to do some independent research on iVotronic voting computers for
its Aug. 13 article, "Marion Places Faith in Voting
Machines," rather than relying wholly on the statements of an
iVotronic representative.
In that article, Danny Cline, salesman for a firm which markets
iVotronic, is quoted as saying, "This equipment has been
manufactured for 15 years and we haven't lost a vote yet."
That's just not true. iVotronic computers--the same iVotronic
computers which Marion County's commissioners have just paid more
than $100,000 to lease -- have lost votes in elections over and
over.
In Wake County, N.C., iVotronic voting computers lost 436 votes,
and the company itself admitted that their machines -- not
inexperienced pollworkers or untrained voters -- were to blame. Wake
County decided not to use iVotronic computers for future electi ons.
In Miami, which also used iVotronic computers, hundreds of votes
went missing in the Democratic primary. Several precincts with
thousands of voters reported only a few votes, although voters had
been turning out steadily all day. That was finally traced to a
problem with iVotronic's hardware.
And these aren't the only such instances; they're just the
largest and the best-known. The Miami incident made the national
news. It's surprising that Cline is unaware of it. Cline is also
reported as saying, "As for a paper ballot printout, it wasn't
an issue until the federal government raised the question."
Actually, computer scientists and other computer-literate people,
those who understand how computers work and how vulnerable any
computer is to error, have been calling for paper receipts for
voting computers for years now. With voting computers, a back-up
voting system of some sort is the only way to detect error or fraud.
In the Wake County incident mentioned above, the 436 unrecorded
votes were spotted only because the county was testing the computers
by also using optical scanners.
If the county must use voting computers at all (optical scanners
are both cheaper and more accurate), then the simplest and easiest
way to provide a voter-verifiable backup system is to give each
voter a printed receipt, just as any ATM machine does now. That way
voters can check their receipts to make sure their votes have been
recorded accurately, and drop them in the ballot box on their way
out. Then, if any question arises about the computers' tally, there
will be a physical record of voters' votes.
In light of the fact that iVotronic computers do not give paper
receipts, it is particularly regrettable that Marion County's
commissioners have decided to enter into a lease which provides
substantial financial incentives for buying iVotronic computers in
future. A state legislative subcommittee is currently considering
requiring voting computers to give paper receipts, and if it does so
then Marion County will be unable to use those incentives and will
end up paying the full $100,000 for this fall's lease.
Meredith Dixon
Mannington
|